All Stories
Showing posts with label UBUNTU. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UBUNTU. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 November 2016

Introduction

I have received a number of comments with regards to the procedure for dual booting Windows 10 and Ubuntu.

Some people have noticed that the free disk space they created is not available for use when they try and install Ubuntu.

This article aims to explain why you wouldn't be able to use the free space and who will be affected by this.

Who Is Affected?

If your computer uses the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) then you will not be affected. If however your computer has a legacy BIOS then you may be affected but only if your computer's hard drive already has 4 primary partitions.

How To Check Whether Your Computer Is Using UEFI Or A Legacy BIOS

As we are going to be using the Disk Management screen anyway the easiest way to check whether your computer is UEFI based or not is to right click on the start button and choose the "Disk Management" option from the menu.





















Look at the partitions for your hard disk (which will probably be disk 0). If you see a partition called "EFI System Partition" then you can feel very smug and stop reading this article because you will not be affected by the issue.

The Issue Explained


If there is no EFI partition then you could have issues with partitioning when installing Ubuntu.

The older style BIOS only allows a user to create 4 primary partitions on a disk whereas the newer GPT partitioning system allows more than you will ever need.

The problem with having just 4 partitions available is that Windows 10 often takes up a number of partitions itself. There is one for Windows and at least one for a recovery partition. The manufacturer of the computer quite often has a partition for its own recovery partition and then another partition may have been created for another reason.

As there can only be 4 primary partitions if you have shrunk the Windows partition the free space you have created cannot be placed in a partition and therefore cannot be used.

When you try to install Ubuntu you will not see an option to install alongside Windows and when you choose something else as an option you will see unusable space as shown below.






















The Solution

I can't give you a step by step solution to fix this as it depends entirely on what partitions are currently used on your system.

I can however tell you that all is not lost. 

Whilst you can only have 4 primary partitions you can split a single partition into a number of extended partitions. If you can free up one of the 4 primary partitions you can then create a number of logical/extended partitions on that single partition for installing Ubuntu.

How To Remove A Partition

Freeing up a single partition is the difficult bit.

If you have shrunk the Windows partition to free up space then you will want to delete the partition next to it (no, not the Windows one, probably the one to the right).

The issue is however, what are those partitions used for. If the partition is a Windows recovery partition then you could elect to move that partition to an external hard drive.


The partition might also be the recovery partition created by your computer's manufacturer. In this case you should find the software used by the manufacturer as this may allow you to backup the system to an external hard drive or USB drive which means you can delete the manufacturer's recovery partition and use it with the free space you created by shrinking Windows.

Another option is of course to use Macrium Reflect which I recommended as the backup tool as part of the process for dual booting Ubuntu and Windows 10. (Click here for that guide). You can use Macrium to create recovery media on DVDs, USB drives and external hard drives. With the recovery media safely stored externally you can safely delete the Windows recovery and manufacturer's recovery media.

If you have another partition called data then you might wish to move the data from there onto the Windows partition or indeed another drive such as an external hard drive and delete that partition.

You can delete a partition within the disk management tool by right clicking on it and choosing "delete volume".

Windows recovery partitions cannot be deleted using the disk management tool because the partition will be protected. This guide shows how to delete a protected partition.

It may be the case that the manufacturer's partition or Windows recovery partition is quite large and therefore you don't need the free space created by shrinking Windows any more. You can give the disk space you gained from shrinking Windows back to Windows by right clicking on the Windows partition in the disk management tool and choosing "Extend Volume". 

Given the choice between removing the Windows recovery partition and the manufacturers recovery partition I recommend removing the manufacturer's partition. I would however make sure that I had a viable recovery option available via Macrium reflect or another such tool.

The upshot is that you want to get to a position where you have only 3 primary partitions and then a section of free space on your computer large enough to install Ubuntu.

You should now be able to follow my guide to installing Ubuntu alongside Windows 10 to complete the task.

Summary

This only affects people who are using a computer with a legacy BIOS that already has 4 primary partitions in use.

To fix the issue remove one of the 4 primary partitions. 

Important: If you decide to remove a data partition make sure you have backed up the data first. If you decide to remove a recovery partition make sure you have created other recovery media

After deleting one of the 4 partitions you should be left with 3 primary partitions and an area of unallocated disk space.

When you run the Ubuntu installer you should now see the option to install alongside Windows 10.

If you do not get the option to install alongside Windows 10, choose the something else option as the installation type and create 2 extended partitions in the area of free space, the first taking up most of the disk space and mounted to root (/) and the second taking up around 8 gigabytes for swap space. The amount of swap space can be reduced or increased depending on the age of your machine and amount of memory available.





What To Do When Ubuntu Can't Use Free Unallocated Disk Space

Introduction

I have received a number of comments with regards to the procedure for dual booting Windows 10 and Ubuntu.

Some people have noticed that the free disk space they created is not available for use when they try and install Ubuntu.

This article aims to explain why you wouldn't be able to use the free space and who will be affected by this.

Who Is Affected?

If your computer uses the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) then you will not be affected. If however your computer has a legacy BIOS then you may be affected but only if your computer's hard drive already has 4 primary partitions.

How To Check Whether Your Computer Is Using UEFI Or A Legacy BIOS

As we are going to be using the Disk Management screen anyway the easiest way to check whether your computer is UEFI based or not is to right click on the start button and choose the "Disk Management" option from the menu.





















Look at the partitions for your hard disk (which will probably be disk 0). If you see a partition called "EFI System Partition" then you can feel very smug and stop reading this article because you will not be affected by the issue.

The Issue Explained


If there is no EFI partition then you could have issues with partitioning when installing Ubuntu.

The older style BIOS only allows a user to create 4 primary partitions on a disk whereas the newer GPT partitioning system allows more than you will ever need.

The problem with having just 4 partitions available is that Windows 10 often takes up a number of partitions itself. There is one for Windows and at least one for a recovery partition. The manufacturer of the computer quite often has a partition for its own recovery partition and then another partition may have been created for another reason.

As there can only be 4 primary partitions if you have shrunk the Windows partition the free space you have created cannot be placed in a partition and therefore cannot be used.

When you try to install Ubuntu you will not see an option to install alongside Windows and when you choose something else as an option you will see unusable space as shown below.






















The Solution

I can't give you a step by step solution to fix this as it depends entirely on what partitions are currently used on your system.

I can however tell you that all is not lost. 

Whilst you can only have 4 primary partitions you can split a single partition into a number of extended partitions. If you can free up one of the 4 primary partitions you can then create a number of logical/extended partitions on that single partition for installing Ubuntu.

How To Remove A Partition

Freeing up a single partition is the difficult bit.

If you have shrunk the Windows partition to free up space then you will want to delete the partition next to it (no, not the Windows one, probably the one to the right).

The issue is however, what are those partitions used for. If the partition is a Windows recovery partition then you could elect to move that partition to an external hard drive.


The partition might also be the recovery partition created by your computer's manufacturer. In this case you should find the software used by the manufacturer as this may allow you to backup the system to an external hard drive or USB drive which means you can delete the manufacturer's recovery partition and use it with the free space you created by shrinking Windows.

Another option is of course to use Macrium Reflect which I recommended as the backup tool as part of the process for dual booting Ubuntu and Windows 10. (Click here for that guide). You can use Macrium to create recovery media on DVDs, USB drives and external hard drives. With the recovery media safely stored externally you can safely delete the Windows recovery and manufacturer's recovery media.

If you have another partition called data then you might wish to move the data from there onto the Windows partition or indeed another drive such as an external hard drive and delete that partition.

You can delete a partition within the disk management tool by right clicking on it and choosing "delete volume".

Windows recovery partitions cannot be deleted using the disk management tool because the partition will be protected. This guide shows how to delete a protected partition.

It may be the case that the manufacturer's partition or Windows recovery partition is quite large and therefore you don't need the free space created by shrinking Windows any more. You can give the disk space you gained from shrinking Windows back to Windows by right clicking on the Windows partition in the disk management tool and choosing "Extend Volume". 

Given the choice between removing the Windows recovery partition and the manufacturers recovery partition I recommend removing the manufacturer's partition. I would however make sure that I had a viable recovery option available via Macrium reflect or another such tool.

The upshot is that you want to get to a position where you have only 3 primary partitions and then a section of free space on your computer large enough to install Ubuntu.

You should now be able to follow my guide to installing Ubuntu alongside Windows 10 to complete the task.

Summary

This only affects people who are using a computer with a legacy BIOS that already has 4 primary partitions in use.

To fix the issue remove one of the 4 primary partitions. 

Important: If you decide to remove a data partition make sure you have backed up the data first. If you decide to remove a recovery partition make sure you have created other recovery media

After deleting one of the 4 partitions you should be left with 3 primary partitions and an area of unallocated disk space.

When you run the Ubuntu installer you should now see the option to install alongside Windows 10.

If you do not get the option to install alongside Windows 10, choose the something else option as the installation type and create 2 extended partitions in the area of free space, the first taking up most of the disk space and mounted to root (/) and the second taking up around 8 gigabytes for swap space. The amount of swap space can be reduced or increased depending on the age of your machine and amount of memory available.





Posted at 20:07 |  by Gary Newell

Thursday, 1 September 2016

Introduction



At the beginning of August I released an article listing the 5 Linux distributions that I would recommend for the Everyday Linux User.

The distributions I listed in the article were Linux Mint, Ubuntu, Peppermint, Manjaro and PCLinuxOS. These are great multipurpose Linux distributions that are easy to install, easy to use and they are updated regularly.

I asked you to submit a list of the distributions you would recommend to the Everyday Linux User. You can continue to submit your list at that site although only the people who have submitted up until the end of August will be considered for the Amazon gift cards. 

The response has been really good although many of you submitted a list without saying why you would recommend the distributions.

In this article I am going to analyse the results of the lists that were sent through.

The Most In Depth Submission


The most in depth submission was from David Bley who presented a list containing Lubuntu for lightweight computers, Ubuntu MATE for a main computer and DSL as a tiny Linux distribution.

Ubuntu MATE could easily have made my own list and it is a matter of choice as to whether you prefer MATE as a desktop or Unity.

With regards to Lubuntu I feel that Peppermint actually gives you a better experience and I would even consider LXLE over Lubuntu. Lubuntu has been a lifesaver on older netbooks though.

It Takes Some Convincing


Kamaljit Dadyal came up with a list consisting of Linux Mint, Stella and Xubuntu. That isn't to say that he didn't come up with any more but as he explains himself the other distributions that he tried let him down in one way or another.

He finally settled on Android and Netrunner as the last 2 options.


Common Themes


I received an entry from Bernard Victor who chose Korora, Manjaro, Mint, Ubuntu MATE and LXLE.

The reasons were given as follows:

1- Korora KDE  Very complete package. Stable base. Easy to alter to your own requirements. Rolling release.
2- Manjaro Cinnamon - A very complete package. Very easy to install and another rolling release.
3.- Mint 18 Cinnamon - Another easy to install complete package, but no rolling updates
4- Ubuntu Mate - Easy to install on a stable base. Good selection of applications. Not rolling.
5- LXLE - Good package for older computers. Pleasant interface, but not rolling release.
Trends started to appear even after just a few entries. Manjaro, Mint, Ubuntu MATE were suggested multiple times.

For those who are unaware Korora is a remixed version of Fedora. It is to Fedora what Ubuntu is to Debian. Korora provides easy access to things like multimedia codecs and commonly used packages. I have to admit that I haven't looked at it in a while.

LXLE is like Lubuntu on steroids. Basically you get some really nice wallpapers and a selection of applications installed such as LibreOffice.  It is definitely worth checking out.

Prasad Kumar Manigaradi provides a list containing Linux Mint, Ubuntu MATE, Elementary OS, Solus and Ubuntu.

The reasons given were as follows:

Linux Mint Cinnamon - For newer systems. Preservers most of traditional UI
Ubuntu Mate - Fast, sleek and works well on older systems without any radical new UI
Elementary OS - For those who want to have perfection given to each tiny pixel on screen
Solus OS - New to the race, but this distro is more focused on speed while being a desktop focused distro implementing all the latest technologies. 
Ubuntu OS - Finally Ubuntu. If community support is what you are looking at, then there is no better solution than Ubuntu. Although they are known to make some radical and nonsensical choices, they have a very active community where almost any issue can be resolved pretty quickly.
Whilst there was the odd curveball distribution suggested, most people came up with the same names over and over again. Linux Mint, Ubuntu MATE, Manjaro, Zorin and Ubuntu.

Going The Extra Mile 

Juan Martinez didn't stop at just five distributions. Maybe it isn't that easy to break down. I know I struggled.

Juan's list consisted of Kubuntu, OZ Sapphire?, CentOS, Mint, Ultimate Edition, Ubuntu Studio and Luninux.

I'm not sure what OZ Sapphire is but the comment that comes with it is as follows:

Oz Sapphire turbo charged Ubuntu 14.04. running with gnome-flashback and a mac like Docky. Like Ubuntu but better.
The rest of the reasons given by Juan were as follows:

1.      Kubuntu 14.04 KDE 4.11, my go to for development, most customizable and most stable.
2.      Oz Sapphire turbo charged Ubuntu 14.04. running with gnome-flashback and a mac like Docky. Like Ubuntu but better.
3.      CentOS  7 KDE Because it is good, stable and long support. Codecs and all were easy to install.
4.      Mint 17.2 Cinnamon because it is so stable and beautiful.
5.      Ultimate 4.9 KDE awesome take on Ubuntu with tons of great software installed.
6.      Ubuntu Studio 14.04 and 16.04 XFCE, this would be more awesome with a 5 year LTS version. My favorite for media.
7.      Luninux 12 my previous favorite with gnome flashback style and a Docky. Needs a current update to 16.04. Elegant, Beautiful! 

Most of the suggestions were Ubuntu in one way or another but kudos has to go out for suggesting Luninux.

Luninux was one of the first distributions I ever reviewed and I did it via a guest post to Duck Duck's website, Linux Notes From Dark Duck.

Juan Martinez wasn't the only person to submit more than just 5 distributions. Emanuele Carrea also gave me some bonus content.

Emanuele's main list of 5 consisted of Linux Mint, Deepin, Manjaro, RemixOS and Netrunner. There were some extras added called Siduction and Semplice but he admits they are just his personal choices and rough around the edges.

1 Linux Mint - thanks to deb system and mate/cinnamon desktops is easily manageable for new users
2 Deepin - Very attractive interface (I'd even say sexy...) and surprisingly stable and reliable
3 Manjaro - Install it and forget it. Arch rolling release is revolutionary approach for newbies, but is very easy and pleasent to get used to (personally, used gnome edition). Be up to date and never reinstall
4 Remixos - Android on your PC, easy and familiar for android phone users
5 Netrunner - Again, a rolling distro, arch/manjaro based, but with an attractive KDE interface
This is my very personal list.
Bonus distros, Siduction and Semplice Linux.
Both based on debian unstable, rough on the edges and you'll get a lot of small issues. Despite this, they have great communities available to help you. If you want to learn what gnu/linux is, this is a great step forward. At least it is how I started with linux a few years back (well, it was kanotix and sidux, but they evolved)...

Ubuntu and Only Ubuntu


One of the first recommendations I received was from Ed Mollat. His recommendation was Ubuntu and just Ubuntu.

The reason given for recommending Ubuntu was as follows:

I recommend Ubuntu Linux as one of the best around if not the best. In particular Ubuntu 16.04.  It is user friendly & has all the functions one can possibly need.

Dude, It's Manjaro

Brandon Stinnett came up with a list consisting of Zorin OS, Linux Mint, Trisquel, SolusOS and Manjaro.

This submission came with my favourite reason for recommending a Linux distribution:

Dude, It's Manjaro.
Brandon's reasons for submitting the others on the list were as follows:

Zorin OS
One of the easiest ways to convert from a windows system

Linux Mint
One of the finest examples of Linux distros for beginner and expert users

Trisquel
Pushes the boundaries of what foss can achieve

Solus
Revolutionary in its minimalistic ways to improve computing

Zorin worries me a little bit and I plan on a full article explaining why. Basically Zorin is built using Ubuntu as a base. Zorin 9 was built against Ubuntu 14.04 but subsequent releases of Zorin were built against newer versions of Ubuntu for which the support ran out recently. As Zorin were a bit slow in releasing a new LTS version they dropped the downloads for Zorin 10 and 11 from their website because they were unsupported. What happened to all the users who had already installed them?

I think Solus could be a future recommendation by me but when I tried it I found the repositories just too small and therefore I was limited to what I could achieve with it.

Some Linux Notes From Dark Duck

I received the following entry from Dmitry who is known by most of you as Dark Duck. If you haven't visited his site then please do because it has some excellent reviews and information.

Dmitry came up with a list consisting of Xubuntu, Linux Mint, Debian, Manjaro and Zorin.

The reasons given were as follows:

Xubuntu - the leader
Linux Mint 17, not 18 - ease of use
Debian - rock solid and long-term support
Manjaro - innovative and interesting
Zorin - good for beginners

(without particular order, except for Xubuntu's #1)

The Antidote To Manjaro?


Gary Bean at first came up with just a single suggestion which was Antergos. Gary went on to explain that on all of his computers Manjaro presented different issues whereas Antergos worked without error.

I tried Antergos myself last week and my view was slightly different.

I asked Gary if he had any other suggestions and he came up with a list containing openSUSE Tumbleweed, Sabayon and Kubuntu.

Lost And Found

Angel Perez used to have a computer with Linux Mint on it but it was lost and then found again. 

Hello, my name is Angel Pérez from Spain and I use several distros for different reasons as I explain below: 
1.- My favourite one is Porteus. I use it on a corporate laptop with strong limits when installing new software. I cannot use skype on it and internet surfing is quite limited. So, I have a 4 GB usb key with KDE porteus on it and after 30 seconds I have nearly complete freedom on a HP probook notebook. I appreciate speed on booting mainly on this distro and having all in a usb stick.

2.- Lubuntu. I have an old netbook (Asus aspire one) at home and Lubuntu seems to be most suitable for it, so I have been using it since two years. Quite easy for me and my wife to switch from XP to it.

3.- Xubuntu. For a while I tried it in the netbook with similar performance but better feeling for me. I like a lot the graphical enviroment.

4.- Linux mint (mate). My previous corporate computer was «lost» but I «found» it. The hard drive was password protected so I formatted and installed something my mother could use. She had no experience and found it easy to use. 

5.- Linux mint (cinnamon). My brother was jealous about this new OS in my mother computer and he was looking for an alternative to windows 7 in his laptop, so I installed mint and he has dual booting. Mostly used for surfing the web and for torrent downloads. also as a media center. Very elegant desktop.
I have never tried Porteus but it is one I plan to test out within the next week. According to the website Porteus is insanely fast and very small (under 300 mb).

Leaving It Late

The last submission I received was from David Yentzen.

David explained his criteria for choosing a distribution as needing to be easy to install, easy to setup, easy to maintain, must have good documentation and most important of all a good community.

The list consisted of Ubuntu Mate, ChaletOS, Maui 1 Aurora (succession to Netrunner), Linux Lite and Cub Linux.

The criteria I use are: easy to install, easy to setup, easy to maintain( install/uninstall software), good documentation, and (importantly) a friendly actve community/forum.

1. Ubuntu Mate 16.04 - This is the Linux distro I recommend to complete non-tech end users.

2.  ChaletOS - New kid on the block. Designed to make coming from Windows easy.

3.  Maui 1 "Aurora" - The successor to Netrunner.  It's based on Neon KDE but highly reconfigured to work right out of the box. 
      ----Full disclosure----Maui 1 is what I use

4.  Linux Lite - a hugely overlooked smaller size distro that really delivers a quality OS while light on resources.

5.  Cub Linux - A great distro for anyone that wants the Chrome OS experience but also wants maximum control over the OS. Very easy to use & super light on resources.  

Without Explanation

In many cases there were no explanations. For instance Juan Carlos submitted the following list:

  • Linux Mint
  • Manjaro
  • Ubuntu
  • Fedora
  • Zorin
Geoff from Australia came up with this list:
  • Linux Mint MATE
  • Linux Lite
  • Manjaro
  • Ubuntu
  • Makulu
Makulu is a good shout and is one of my favourite alternative Linux distributions. Check out the aero edition.

Chandra Chaniago came up with these:


  • Makulu Linux Lindoz edition
  • Linux Mint
  • Chalet OS
  • Ubuntu 
  • Linux Lite
Another distribution I will be reviewing shortly is Chalet OS. I have read many good things about this distribution recently. Checkout the video on the homepage.

And Then There Is The Comments Section

Finally there were a few people who listed their responses in the comments section.

Teklordz suggested these distributions:

  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu Studio
  • Zorin
  • Linux Lite
  • Ubuntu
Derek Curry submitted these:
  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu
  • OpenSUSE Leap
  • Korora
  • Linux Lite
David Locklear simply said "Korora 24 is nice". 

Tanel Lindmae suggested these:

  • Debian 
  • Ubuntu
  • Red Hat
Zorin Lacic went for the following:
  • openSUSE Tumbleweed
  • openSUSE Leap
  • Arch
  • Slackware
  • KaOS
Geezergeek's choice was as follows:
  • Peppermint 
  • Linux Lite
  • Mint
  • Ubuntu Studio
Thomas Jensen suggested these:
  • Ubuntu
  • Peppermint
  • Manjaro
  • Apricity
And finally CM Carbon went for this selection:
  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu MATE
  • Manjaro
  • Gecko
  • TRIOS (because it is fighting with SystemD)

Summary

August was a light month for me blogging wise because I was in Florida for 2 weeks and unable to post anything.

In September I will be ramping things back up and writing more reviews and more tutorials.

What this process has shown me is that I have a lot of good readers and I thank everyone who submitted a list and everyone who reads the blog.

I also have a very diverse reader base with people coming from all over the world to submit their lists.

From a technical point of view there were 42 different distribution suggestions and this is maybe why it is hard to suggest a top 5.

However if I sort the data based on the number of suggestions per distribution the top 5 are as follows:
  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu
  • Manjaro
  • Linux Lite
  • Ubuntu MATE / ZorinOS
My original list included three of those distributions and the two that didn't make the list above are Peppermint OS and PCLinuxOS.

I can't argue with Linux Lite and it is definitely up for a new review in September and Ubuntu MATE should probably have made the list of PCLinuxOS. As mentioned earlier I have concerns over Zorin and I will state my case in a new article next week.

I stick with my suggestion of Peppermint however because it has been around a long time and it provides a good blend between being lightweight yet productive. I also personally still think PCLinuxOS is a good choice although often overlooked.

Thanks for reading.

I Asked "What Are The Best Linux Distributions For The Average Person", You Answered

Introduction



At the beginning of August I released an article listing the 5 Linux distributions that I would recommend for the Everyday Linux User.

The distributions I listed in the article were Linux Mint, Ubuntu, Peppermint, Manjaro and PCLinuxOS. These are great multipurpose Linux distributions that are easy to install, easy to use and they are updated regularly.

I asked you to submit a list of the distributions you would recommend to the Everyday Linux User. You can continue to submit your list at that site although only the people who have submitted up until the end of August will be considered for the Amazon gift cards. 

The response has been really good although many of you submitted a list without saying why you would recommend the distributions.

In this article I am going to analyse the results of the lists that were sent through.

The Most In Depth Submission


The most in depth submission was from David Bley who presented a list containing Lubuntu for lightweight computers, Ubuntu MATE for a main computer and DSL as a tiny Linux distribution.

Ubuntu MATE could easily have made my own list and it is a matter of choice as to whether you prefer MATE as a desktop or Unity.

With regards to Lubuntu I feel that Peppermint actually gives you a better experience and I would even consider LXLE over Lubuntu. Lubuntu has been a lifesaver on older netbooks though.

It Takes Some Convincing


Kamaljit Dadyal came up with a list consisting of Linux Mint, Stella and Xubuntu. That isn't to say that he didn't come up with any more but as he explains himself the other distributions that he tried let him down in one way or another.

He finally settled on Android and Netrunner as the last 2 options.


Common Themes


I received an entry from Bernard Victor who chose Korora, Manjaro, Mint, Ubuntu MATE and LXLE.

The reasons were given as follows:

1- Korora KDE  Very complete package. Stable base. Easy to alter to your own requirements. Rolling release.
2- Manjaro Cinnamon - A very complete package. Very easy to install and another rolling release.
3.- Mint 18 Cinnamon - Another easy to install complete package, but no rolling updates
4- Ubuntu Mate - Easy to install on a stable base. Good selection of applications. Not rolling.
5- LXLE - Good package for older computers. Pleasant interface, but not rolling release.
Trends started to appear even after just a few entries. Manjaro, Mint, Ubuntu MATE were suggested multiple times.

For those who are unaware Korora is a remixed version of Fedora. It is to Fedora what Ubuntu is to Debian. Korora provides easy access to things like multimedia codecs and commonly used packages. I have to admit that I haven't looked at it in a while.

LXLE is like Lubuntu on steroids. Basically you get some really nice wallpapers and a selection of applications installed such as LibreOffice.  It is definitely worth checking out.

Prasad Kumar Manigaradi provides a list containing Linux Mint, Ubuntu MATE, Elementary OS, Solus and Ubuntu.

The reasons given were as follows:

Linux Mint Cinnamon - For newer systems. Preservers most of traditional UI
Ubuntu Mate - Fast, sleek and works well on older systems without any radical new UI
Elementary OS - For those who want to have perfection given to each tiny pixel on screen
Solus OS - New to the race, but this distro is more focused on speed while being a desktop focused distro implementing all the latest technologies. 
Ubuntu OS - Finally Ubuntu. If community support is what you are looking at, then there is no better solution than Ubuntu. Although they are known to make some radical and nonsensical choices, they have a very active community where almost any issue can be resolved pretty quickly.
Whilst there was the odd curveball distribution suggested, most people came up with the same names over and over again. Linux Mint, Ubuntu MATE, Manjaro, Zorin and Ubuntu.

Going The Extra Mile 

Juan Martinez didn't stop at just five distributions. Maybe it isn't that easy to break down. I know I struggled.

Juan's list consisted of Kubuntu, OZ Sapphire?, CentOS, Mint, Ultimate Edition, Ubuntu Studio and Luninux.

I'm not sure what OZ Sapphire is but the comment that comes with it is as follows:

Oz Sapphire turbo charged Ubuntu 14.04. running with gnome-flashback and a mac like Docky. Like Ubuntu but better.
The rest of the reasons given by Juan were as follows:

1.      Kubuntu 14.04 KDE 4.11, my go to for development, most customizable and most stable.
2.      Oz Sapphire turbo charged Ubuntu 14.04. running with gnome-flashback and a mac like Docky. Like Ubuntu but better.
3.      CentOS  7 KDE Because it is good, stable and long support. Codecs and all were easy to install.
4.      Mint 17.2 Cinnamon because it is so stable and beautiful.
5.      Ultimate 4.9 KDE awesome take on Ubuntu with tons of great software installed.
6.      Ubuntu Studio 14.04 and 16.04 XFCE, this would be more awesome with a 5 year LTS version. My favorite for media.
7.      Luninux 12 my previous favorite with gnome flashback style and a Docky. Needs a current update to 16.04. Elegant, Beautiful! 

Most of the suggestions were Ubuntu in one way or another but kudos has to go out for suggesting Luninux.

Luninux was one of the first distributions I ever reviewed and I did it via a guest post to Duck Duck's website, Linux Notes From Dark Duck.

Juan Martinez wasn't the only person to submit more than just 5 distributions. Emanuele Carrea also gave me some bonus content.

Emanuele's main list of 5 consisted of Linux Mint, Deepin, Manjaro, RemixOS and Netrunner. There were some extras added called Siduction and Semplice but he admits they are just his personal choices and rough around the edges.

1 Linux Mint - thanks to deb system and mate/cinnamon desktops is easily manageable for new users
2 Deepin - Very attractive interface (I'd even say sexy...) and surprisingly stable and reliable
3 Manjaro - Install it and forget it. Arch rolling release is revolutionary approach for newbies, but is very easy and pleasent to get used to (personally, used gnome edition). Be up to date and never reinstall
4 Remixos - Android on your PC, easy and familiar for android phone users
5 Netrunner - Again, a rolling distro, arch/manjaro based, but with an attractive KDE interface
This is my very personal list.
Bonus distros, Siduction and Semplice Linux.
Both based on debian unstable, rough on the edges and you'll get a lot of small issues. Despite this, they have great communities available to help you. If you want to learn what gnu/linux is, this is a great step forward. At least it is how I started with linux a few years back (well, it was kanotix and sidux, but they evolved)...

Ubuntu and Only Ubuntu


One of the first recommendations I received was from Ed Mollat. His recommendation was Ubuntu and just Ubuntu.

The reason given for recommending Ubuntu was as follows:

I recommend Ubuntu Linux as one of the best around if not the best. In particular Ubuntu 16.04.  It is user friendly & has all the functions one can possibly need.

Dude, It's Manjaro

Brandon Stinnett came up with a list consisting of Zorin OS, Linux Mint, Trisquel, SolusOS and Manjaro.

This submission came with my favourite reason for recommending a Linux distribution:

Dude, It's Manjaro.
Brandon's reasons for submitting the others on the list were as follows:

Zorin OS
One of the easiest ways to convert from a windows system

Linux Mint
One of the finest examples of Linux distros for beginner and expert users

Trisquel
Pushes the boundaries of what foss can achieve

Solus
Revolutionary in its minimalistic ways to improve computing

Zorin worries me a little bit and I plan on a full article explaining why. Basically Zorin is built using Ubuntu as a base. Zorin 9 was built against Ubuntu 14.04 but subsequent releases of Zorin were built against newer versions of Ubuntu for which the support ran out recently. As Zorin were a bit slow in releasing a new LTS version they dropped the downloads for Zorin 10 and 11 from their website because they were unsupported. What happened to all the users who had already installed them?

I think Solus could be a future recommendation by me but when I tried it I found the repositories just too small and therefore I was limited to what I could achieve with it.

Some Linux Notes From Dark Duck

I received the following entry from Dmitry who is known by most of you as Dark Duck. If you haven't visited his site then please do because it has some excellent reviews and information.

Dmitry came up with a list consisting of Xubuntu, Linux Mint, Debian, Manjaro and Zorin.

The reasons given were as follows:

Xubuntu - the leader
Linux Mint 17, not 18 - ease of use
Debian - rock solid and long-term support
Manjaro - innovative and interesting
Zorin - good for beginners

(without particular order, except for Xubuntu's #1)

The Antidote To Manjaro?


Gary Bean at first came up with just a single suggestion which was Antergos. Gary went on to explain that on all of his computers Manjaro presented different issues whereas Antergos worked without error.

I tried Antergos myself last week and my view was slightly different.

I asked Gary if he had any other suggestions and he came up with a list containing openSUSE Tumbleweed, Sabayon and Kubuntu.

Lost And Found

Angel Perez used to have a computer with Linux Mint on it but it was lost and then found again. 

Hello, my name is Angel Pérez from Spain and I use several distros for different reasons as I explain below: 
1.- My favourite one is Porteus. I use it on a corporate laptop with strong limits when installing new software. I cannot use skype on it and internet surfing is quite limited. So, I have a 4 GB usb key with KDE porteus on it and after 30 seconds I have nearly complete freedom on a HP probook notebook. I appreciate speed on booting mainly on this distro and having all in a usb stick.

2.- Lubuntu. I have an old netbook (Asus aspire one) at home and Lubuntu seems to be most suitable for it, so I have been using it since two years. Quite easy for me and my wife to switch from XP to it.

3.- Xubuntu. For a while I tried it in the netbook with similar performance but better feeling for me. I like a lot the graphical enviroment.

4.- Linux mint (mate). My previous corporate computer was «lost» but I «found» it. The hard drive was password protected so I formatted and installed something my mother could use. She had no experience and found it easy to use. 

5.- Linux mint (cinnamon). My brother was jealous about this new OS in my mother computer and he was looking for an alternative to windows 7 in his laptop, so I installed mint and he has dual booting. Mostly used for surfing the web and for torrent downloads. also as a media center. Very elegant desktop.
I have never tried Porteus but it is one I plan to test out within the next week. According to the website Porteus is insanely fast and very small (under 300 mb).

Leaving It Late

The last submission I received was from David Yentzen.

David explained his criteria for choosing a distribution as needing to be easy to install, easy to setup, easy to maintain, must have good documentation and most important of all a good community.

The list consisted of Ubuntu Mate, ChaletOS, Maui 1 Aurora (succession to Netrunner), Linux Lite and Cub Linux.

The criteria I use are: easy to install, easy to setup, easy to maintain( install/uninstall software), good documentation, and (importantly) a friendly actve community/forum.

1. Ubuntu Mate 16.04 - This is the Linux distro I recommend to complete non-tech end users.

2.  ChaletOS - New kid on the block. Designed to make coming from Windows easy.

3.  Maui 1 "Aurora" - The successor to Netrunner.  It's based on Neon KDE but highly reconfigured to work right out of the box. 
      ----Full disclosure----Maui 1 is what I use

4.  Linux Lite - a hugely overlooked smaller size distro that really delivers a quality OS while light on resources.

5.  Cub Linux - A great distro for anyone that wants the Chrome OS experience but also wants maximum control over the OS. Very easy to use & super light on resources.  

Without Explanation

In many cases there were no explanations. For instance Juan Carlos submitted the following list:

  • Linux Mint
  • Manjaro
  • Ubuntu
  • Fedora
  • Zorin
Geoff from Australia came up with this list:
  • Linux Mint MATE
  • Linux Lite
  • Manjaro
  • Ubuntu
  • Makulu
Makulu is a good shout and is one of my favourite alternative Linux distributions. Check out the aero edition.

Chandra Chaniago came up with these:


  • Makulu Linux Lindoz edition
  • Linux Mint
  • Chalet OS
  • Ubuntu 
  • Linux Lite
Another distribution I will be reviewing shortly is Chalet OS. I have read many good things about this distribution recently. Checkout the video on the homepage.

And Then There Is The Comments Section

Finally there were a few people who listed their responses in the comments section.

Teklordz suggested these distributions:

  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu Studio
  • Zorin
  • Linux Lite
  • Ubuntu
Derek Curry submitted these:
  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu
  • OpenSUSE Leap
  • Korora
  • Linux Lite
David Locklear simply said "Korora 24 is nice". 

Tanel Lindmae suggested these:

  • Debian 
  • Ubuntu
  • Red Hat
Zorin Lacic went for the following:
  • openSUSE Tumbleweed
  • openSUSE Leap
  • Arch
  • Slackware
  • KaOS
Geezergeek's choice was as follows:
  • Peppermint 
  • Linux Lite
  • Mint
  • Ubuntu Studio
Thomas Jensen suggested these:
  • Ubuntu
  • Peppermint
  • Manjaro
  • Apricity
And finally CM Carbon went for this selection:
  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu MATE
  • Manjaro
  • Gecko
  • TRIOS (because it is fighting with SystemD)

Summary

August was a light month for me blogging wise because I was in Florida for 2 weeks and unable to post anything.

In September I will be ramping things back up and writing more reviews and more tutorials.

What this process has shown me is that I have a lot of good readers and I thank everyone who submitted a list and everyone who reads the blog.

I also have a very diverse reader base with people coming from all over the world to submit their lists.

From a technical point of view there were 42 different distribution suggestions and this is maybe why it is hard to suggest a top 5.

However if I sort the data based on the number of suggestions per distribution the top 5 are as follows:
  • Linux Mint
  • Ubuntu
  • Manjaro
  • Linux Lite
  • Ubuntu MATE / ZorinOS
My original list included three of those distributions and the two that didn't make the list above are Peppermint OS and PCLinuxOS.

I can't argue with Linux Lite and it is definitely up for a new review in September and Ubuntu MATE should probably have made the list of PCLinuxOS. As mentioned earlier I have concerns over Zorin and I will state my case in a new article next week.

I stick with my suggestion of Peppermint however because it has been around a long time and it provides a good blend between being lightweight yet productive. I also personally still think PCLinuxOS is a good choice although often overlooked.

Thanks for reading.

Posted at 20:14 |  by Gary Newell

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

Introduction

A few weeks ago I wrote a list of the 5 Linux distributions that I would recommend for the Everyday Linux User.

Within minutes of its release I was asked why various other distributions weren't considered for the list.

I therefore set a challenge asking people to submit their own lists with reasons as to why they would choose those distributions.

Here is an entry by David Bley who obliged my request. This in my opinion is the most well thought out and elaborated entry as yet so I thought I would share it with you first.

The Top 5 Linux Distributions

By David Bley


I don't fit your definition of an everyday linux user but I consider myself one. My favourite Windows OS was XP.  I did not care for Windows 7 and did not like the gestapo tactics that MS used to roll out Windows 10.

I started in IBM PC's at dos 2.1, so the terminal works OK for me, but I have become more used to a GUI to do things and prefer it.  I want the OS to fade into the background and let me run the software I need to perform the task.

Also, in the mid to late 80's I used an IBM AT (12MHz !) that had a UNIX co-processor board in it without a GUI, so I learned some basic UNIX commands for copying files, listing directories, etc.

I will assume that everyday linux users are coming from a windows environment or that they have gotten a workable piece of hardware (desktop or laptop) that the original OS has become obsolete on and are installing Linux because updating their current OS is not possible or too expensive. I am assuming that everyday linux users are not buying a system with linux pre-installed, unless it is a Raspberry-PI or a C.H.I.P. computer.

So my requirements for a Linux distribution are that the installation should be easy, not ask me questions that I don't understand, and work with minimal fiddling, which includes installing a printer.  As far as all the things that most developers seem to worry about, what the screen looks like and what apps are installed​ and how fast it is, are of secondary importance.  If it is too slow, then I am mostly using the wrong hardware although I grew up before computers and any wordprocessor is faster than a typewriter.

Other requirements that I come across is a distribution that will run on older hardware. this includes being small (fits on single CD), being lightweight (runs adequately on minimal RAM - approx 256MB) and supports all hardware on older machines.

I have examined many different distributions for the hardware that I have.


My top distribution for 32 bit machines is Lubuntu as it was the first distribution that I installed on my constantly used Windows XP netbook. My current version is 14.04 LTS, mostly because at this point in time I don't want to update and possibly convert a working computer to a non-working one.

On my 64 bit computer, I am running Ubuntu Mate 14.04  This computer is a return from lease that had XP installed.  I tried to install the 64 bit version of Lubuntu but it did not work properly.  Even with Mate, the graphics driver had an issue, but some poking around on the Ubuntu website got me an answer.  This is my everyday computer (desktop) with a 25" monitor and I have not updated for a similar reason as the first.  I also want to max out RAM to 8G and change out harddisk with a 1T before I change OS.  I am not one to change everything at once and fire it up!

On my oldest systems, which are intended for single purpose use (file server, audio player, home control, etc.) I need a distribution that fits on a CD, will run on older cpu with 256MB of RAM at OK speed.  I have tried many "lightweight" distributions even ones that I had to install from a USB drive using PLOP on boot CD and I keep coming back to Damn Small Linux.  It will fit on a small CD, supports hardware that was running Windows ME, installs easily, and is quite fast.  There is some question as to whether DSL is an active project, but it seems like it is still being maintained even though the releases don't come out very often.

I seem be be stuck in Ubuntu-land.  I have tried other distributions, SUSE, Fedora, Mint and they did not meet my requirements as well even though I did try many.

When I first started down the road of moving from Windows XP to Linux, I found that the number of distributions was daunting.  I used selection aids but they were not as helpful to me as I would have liked.

I have tried to think of two final distributions to add to the list but I cannot.

Summary

David has come up with three Linux distributions: Lubuntu, Ubuntu MATE and Damn Small Linux.

Ubuntu MATE would definitely be close to reaching my top five and I would recommend Lubuntu for low end computers and older netbooks.

Damn Small Linux might be a bit daunting for non-technical users and for something of that size it might be worth thinking about a Puppy Linux such as Simplicity.

Thanks for sharing David.

If you think you can do better read this article and submit your list.

I have received a number of good suggestions in my inbox and as well as posting more of your lists I will be reviewing the likes of Antergos and openSUSE Leap.

Thanks for reading.

An Alternative List Of The Top 3 Linux Distributions For The Everyday Linux User

Introduction

A few weeks ago I wrote a list of the 5 Linux distributions that I would recommend for the Everyday Linux User.

Within minutes of its release I was asked why various other distributions weren't considered for the list.

I therefore set a challenge asking people to submit their own lists with reasons as to why they would choose those distributions.

Here is an entry by David Bley who obliged my request. This in my opinion is the most well thought out and elaborated entry as yet so I thought I would share it with you first.

The Top 5 Linux Distributions

By David Bley


I don't fit your definition of an everyday linux user but I consider myself one. My favourite Windows OS was XP.  I did not care for Windows 7 and did not like the gestapo tactics that MS used to roll out Windows 10.

I started in IBM PC's at dos 2.1, so the terminal works OK for me, but I have become more used to a GUI to do things and prefer it.  I want the OS to fade into the background and let me run the software I need to perform the task.

Also, in the mid to late 80's I used an IBM AT (12MHz !) that had a UNIX co-processor board in it without a GUI, so I learned some basic UNIX commands for copying files, listing directories, etc.

I will assume that everyday linux users are coming from a windows environment or that they have gotten a workable piece of hardware (desktop or laptop) that the original OS has become obsolete on and are installing Linux because updating their current OS is not possible or too expensive. I am assuming that everyday linux users are not buying a system with linux pre-installed, unless it is a Raspberry-PI or a C.H.I.P. computer.

So my requirements for a Linux distribution are that the installation should be easy, not ask me questions that I don't understand, and work with minimal fiddling, which includes installing a printer.  As far as all the things that most developers seem to worry about, what the screen looks like and what apps are installed​ and how fast it is, are of secondary importance.  If it is too slow, then I am mostly using the wrong hardware although I grew up before computers and any wordprocessor is faster than a typewriter.

Other requirements that I come across is a distribution that will run on older hardware. this includes being small (fits on single CD), being lightweight (runs adequately on minimal RAM - approx 256MB) and supports all hardware on older machines.

I have examined many different distributions for the hardware that I have.


My top distribution for 32 bit machines is Lubuntu as it was the first distribution that I installed on my constantly used Windows XP netbook. My current version is 14.04 LTS, mostly because at this point in time I don't want to update and possibly convert a working computer to a non-working one.

On my 64 bit computer, I am running Ubuntu Mate 14.04  This computer is a return from lease that had XP installed.  I tried to install the 64 bit version of Lubuntu but it did not work properly.  Even with Mate, the graphics driver had an issue, but some poking around on the Ubuntu website got me an answer.  This is my everyday computer (desktop) with a 25" monitor and I have not updated for a similar reason as the first.  I also want to max out RAM to 8G and change out harddisk with a 1T before I change OS.  I am not one to change everything at once and fire it up!

On my oldest systems, which are intended for single purpose use (file server, audio player, home control, etc.) I need a distribution that fits on a CD, will run on older cpu with 256MB of RAM at OK speed.  I have tried many "lightweight" distributions even ones that I had to install from a USB drive using PLOP on boot CD and I keep coming back to Damn Small Linux.  It will fit on a small CD, supports hardware that was running Windows ME, installs easily, and is quite fast.  There is some question as to whether DSL is an active project, but it seems like it is still being maintained even though the releases don't come out very often.

I seem be be stuck in Ubuntu-land.  I have tried other distributions, SUSE, Fedora, Mint and they did not meet my requirements as well even though I did try many.

When I first started down the road of moving from Windows XP to Linux, I found that the number of distributions was daunting.  I used selection aids but they were not as helpful to me as I would have liked.

I have tried to think of two final distributions to add to the list but I cannot.

Summary

David has come up with three Linux distributions: Lubuntu, Ubuntu MATE and Damn Small Linux.

Ubuntu MATE would definitely be close to reaching my top five and I would recommend Lubuntu for low end computers and older netbooks.

Damn Small Linux might be a bit daunting for non-technical users and for something of that size it might be worth thinking about a Puppy Linux such as Simplicity.

Thanks for sharing David.

If you think you can do better read this article and submit your list.

I have received a number of good suggestions in my inbox and as well as posting more of your lists I will be reviewing the likes of Antergos and openSUSE Leap.

Thanks for reading.

Posted at 19:46 |  by Gary Newell

Tuesday, 24 May 2016

Introduction

Many of the comments at the bottom of my guides for dual booting Windows 10 with Ubuntu relate to the use of SSDs.

In this guide I am going to show you how I dual booted Ubuntu and Windows 10 on my Lenovo Y700 Ideapad which contains a 128 gigabyte SSD and a 1 terabyte hard drive.

I have dedicated a whole new post for this guide as there is enough information to warrant it but there are links to other guides for areas that cross over.

Backup Your Computer

I always start with this option because you need to know that you can get back to where you started should something go awry.

Follow this guide which shows the safest way to back up Windows 10.

Create A Bootable Ubuntu USB Drive

In order to install Ubuntu you will need a bootable Ubuntu USB drive.



You can either follow this guide which shows how to create a USB drive using Win32 Disk Imager or you can .

Disk Management

This is where the major part of the guide differs from the previous one. 






















Right click on the start button and when the menu appears choose "Disk Management".






















The image above shows how the disks on my laptop were partitioned prior to me changing them.

Quite frankly they are ridiculous and I suspect other people who have bought laptops also have poorly thought out installations by the manufacturers.

Disk 0 represents the 128 gigabyte SSD and Disk 1 represents the 1 gigabyte hard drive.

So Why is this disk layout ridiculous?

The best performance you will get is when you are reading from the SSD. There are 2 recovery partitions installed on that very same SSD.

The whole point of recovery partitions is that they sit out of the way and are only read when you are up a creek without a paddle.

Therefore there is over 20 gigabytes of SSD totally wasted. There is also a recovery area on the hard drive which takes up over 70 gigabytes. 

I think it is sensible to have recovery partitions on the hard drive as although they waste space they are wasting space on the drive you want to use least.

I use Windows very infrequently so I don't need the Windows recovery partitions. I therefore decided to get rid of the Windows recovery partitions and keep the 1 gigabyte OEM partition and the recovery partition on the hard drive. This means I can always do a factory restore. (I have Windows 10 on a USB drive so there really isn't any need for me to keep this really either).























To remove the recovery partitions I opened an administrators command prompt by right clicking on the start button and choosing "Command Prompt (Admin)" from the menu.

The command line tool I used is called diskpart.

To run diskpart simply type diskpart into the command window.

You can view the disks on the computer by typing list disk.

From the image above you will see that disk 0 and disk 1 were returned.

The disk I wanted to work on was disk 0 which is the SSD. To select the disk you wish to amend type select disk n where n is the number of the disk.

To see the partitions on a disk type list partition.

As you can see I have 6 partitions listed. I wanted to remove partition 4 and partition 5 which were the recovery partitions.























To select a partition the command to use is select partition n where n is the number of the partition.

Normally to delete a partition all you have to do is type delete partition.

Recovery partitions are special though and are protected from deletion. You can force the deletion of the partition by typing delete partition override.












































The above image shows my disk after removing the recovery partitions.

Now 20 gigabytes is just about enough for Ubuntu but I wanted more so I reduced the size of the Windows partition as follows.






















To shrink a partition right click on it and choose "Shrink Volume" from the menu.


A window will appear and it will show you how much you can afford to shrink Windows by.  You can choose less than the amount specified but never more.

When you feel you have enough space click "Shrink". I went for the default option.























As you can see I now have nearly 60 gigabytes free for installing Ubuntu to on the SSD.

Power Options






















To be able to boot into Ubuntu you will need to adjust the power options so that your computer can boot from the USB drive.

Right click on the start button and choose "Power Options".





















From the menu click on the option "Choose what the power option does". 

At the top of the screen you will see a link with the words "Change settings that are currently unavailable".

Now scroll down and make sure the "Turn on fast startup" does not have tick in it. If it does click on it until it doesn't.

Click "Save Changes".

Boot Into Ubuntu Live






















To boot into Ubuntu hold down the shift key whilst logged into Windows. Reboot the computer whilst holding down the shift key.

A window will appear with UEFI boot settings. Choose to boot from an external device and choose boot from EFI device.

You should now boot into a live session of Ubuntu.

Install Ubuntu

If you want to be able to install updates during the installation click on the network icon in the top right corner and choose your wireless network. Enter the security key when requested. 

If you are happy to wait until after the installation before installing updates do not worry about connecting to the internet. 

If you have a poor internet connection I recommend not installing updates until after the installation has completed.






















Double click on the install icon on the desktop. The above welcome message should appear. 

Choose your installation language and click "Continue".




















If you haven't connected to the internet then the download updates option will be greyed out but if you have connected you can choose to download updates.

Also on this screen you can choose to install third party codecs which make it possible to play MP3 audio.

Note the option that says that you need to turn off secure boot to install the codecs. It is actually easier to not install codecs now and do it post installation whereby you won't have to do anything with secure boot.

Click "Continue".






Rather strangely I was asked whether I wanted to unmount the SSD before installing. I clicked "No" to this option.



















Normally at this stage I would say to choose the "Install Ubuntu alongside Windows Boot Manager" option but because I want to show how to partition the drive manually I suggest using the "Something Else" option. This allows you to specify where each partition is located.





















The next screen shows the layout of your disks. In my case there are partitions on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.

What you are looking for is the free/unallocated space on /dev/sda which is the SSD and free/unallocated space on /dev/sdb which is the hard drive.

I chose to go for a full install of Ubuntu on the SSD as I will be using this regularly. I also decided to create a swap partition although with 16 gigabytes of RAM this is probably wasted disk space. I therefore put the swap partition on the hard drive.

To create a partition click on the free space on /dev/sda and press the plus symbol.



For the size I chose the whole of the space on the SSD. It is a primary partition and I want to use the beginning of the space (although it doesn't really matter because I am choosing all the space).

I chose EXT4 as the file system and / as the mount point. Clicking OK creates the partition and returns you to the disk layout screen.

With the SSD now completely allocated I moved on to the hard drive.

To create a swap partition I clicked on the free space on /dev/sdb and press the button with the plus symbol again.


I went for the full 16 gigabytes to match the amount of RAM in my machine. This is severely overkill but as I wasn't limited for disk space I went for it anyway.

Again I set the partition to primary but note that I chose to use the end of the space. In theory as this should be hardly used moving it to the end of the disk seems a sensible idea.

The only other thing to note is that I set the use as drop down list to "swap area". Clicking OK takes me back to the disk layout screen.

The rest of the hard drive is still an empty block of free space so what should I do with it?


I chose to create a 50 gigabyte FAT32 partition which gives me a nice area to share files between Linux and Windows without worrying about one not being overly happy with NTFS and the other not being at all happy with EXT4.



The rest I partitioned as a large block of space as an EXT4 partition. This is where I will store all of my larger files that I won't use regularly. Things like movies would fit well into this space.

Note that for these partitions I didn't choose a mount point. I did that later on in the Ubuntu disks tool as it is more user friendly.

With both of the disks now fully allocated I clicked the "Install Now" button. A message appears showing the partitions that will be created. Just continue past this screen.

The rest of the installation is fairly ordinary.

Select where you live by clicking on the map. This will set the time correctly on your computer.


Choose your keyboard layout by selecting the language in the left pane and the layout in the right pane.

Finally create a user. Enter your name and a name for your computer.

Then enter a user name and choose a password and repeat it. 

By default the setup requires you to log in every time you boot but you can get your computer to log in automatically by selecting the option but I don't recommend this.

Click "Continue".

The files will now be copied across and the system will be installed.


Finally you will be asked whether you want to continue testing or restart now. 

You can try rebooting and if the computer boots straight to Windows reinsert the USB drive and hold down the shift key and reboot back to the UEFI boot screen as you did before to get into the live version of Ubuntu.

Then follow this guide which shows how to use EFI Boot Manager to change the boot order.

Summary

When you have finished it is worth following this guide which shows 33 things to do after installing Ubuntu.

Also check out my new guide which shows how to show common applications such as Chrome, Dropbox and Steam easily in Ubuntu.

I am not saying my way is the only way to format the SSD and I welcome comments and suggestions in regards to this area.

The current layout is working well for me however.

Troubleshooting

If Ubuntu still will not boot after running EFI Boot Manager try reading this guide which aims to help with UEFI boot issues.

How To Dual Boot Ubuntu And Windows 10 Using An SSD

Introduction

Many of the comments at the bottom of my guides for dual booting Windows 10 with Ubuntu relate to the use of SSDs.

In this guide I am going to show you how I dual booted Ubuntu and Windows 10 on my Lenovo Y700 Ideapad which contains a 128 gigabyte SSD and a 1 terabyte hard drive.

I have dedicated a whole new post for this guide as there is enough information to warrant it but there are links to other guides for areas that cross over.

Backup Your Computer

I always start with this option because you need to know that you can get back to where you started should something go awry.

Follow this guide which shows the safest way to back up Windows 10.

Create A Bootable Ubuntu USB Drive

In order to install Ubuntu you will need a bootable Ubuntu USB drive.



You can either follow this guide which shows how to create a USB drive using Win32 Disk Imager or you can .

Disk Management

This is where the major part of the guide differs from the previous one. 






















Right click on the start button and when the menu appears choose "Disk Management".






















The image above shows how the disks on my laptop were partitioned prior to me changing them.

Quite frankly they are ridiculous and I suspect other people who have bought laptops also have poorly thought out installations by the manufacturers.

Disk 0 represents the 128 gigabyte SSD and Disk 1 represents the 1 gigabyte hard drive.

So Why is this disk layout ridiculous?

The best performance you will get is when you are reading from the SSD. There are 2 recovery partitions installed on that very same SSD.

The whole point of recovery partitions is that they sit out of the way and are only read when you are up a creek without a paddle.

Therefore there is over 20 gigabytes of SSD totally wasted. There is also a recovery area on the hard drive which takes up over 70 gigabytes. 

I think it is sensible to have recovery partitions on the hard drive as although they waste space they are wasting space on the drive you want to use least.

I use Windows very infrequently so I don't need the Windows recovery partitions. I therefore decided to get rid of the Windows recovery partitions and keep the 1 gigabyte OEM partition and the recovery partition on the hard drive. This means I can always do a factory restore. (I have Windows 10 on a USB drive so there really isn't any need for me to keep this really either).























To remove the recovery partitions I opened an administrators command prompt by right clicking on the start button and choosing "Command Prompt (Admin)" from the menu.

The command line tool I used is called diskpart.

To run diskpart simply type diskpart into the command window.

You can view the disks on the computer by typing list disk.

From the image above you will see that disk 0 and disk 1 were returned.

The disk I wanted to work on was disk 0 which is the SSD. To select the disk you wish to amend type select disk n where n is the number of the disk.

To see the partitions on a disk type list partition.

As you can see I have 6 partitions listed. I wanted to remove partition 4 and partition 5 which were the recovery partitions.























To select a partition the command to use is select partition n where n is the number of the partition.

Normally to delete a partition all you have to do is type delete partition.

Recovery partitions are special though and are protected from deletion. You can force the deletion of the partition by typing delete partition override.












































The above image shows my disk after removing the recovery partitions.

Now 20 gigabytes is just about enough for Ubuntu but I wanted more so I reduced the size of the Windows partition as follows.






















To shrink a partition right click on it and choose "Shrink Volume" from the menu.


A window will appear and it will show you how much you can afford to shrink Windows by.  You can choose less than the amount specified but never more.

When you feel you have enough space click "Shrink". I went for the default option.























As you can see I now have nearly 60 gigabytes free for installing Ubuntu to on the SSD.

Power Options






















To be able to boot into Ubuntu you will need to adjust the power options so that your computer can boot from the USB drive.

Right click on the start button and choose "Power Options".





















From the menu click on the option "Choose what the power option does". 

At the top of the screen you will see a link with the words "Change settings that are currently unavailable".

Now scroll down and make sure the "Turn on fast startup" does not have tick in it. If it does click on it until it doesn't.

Click "Save Changes".

Boot Into Ubuntu Live






















To boot into Ubuntu hold down the shift key whilst logged into Windows. Reboot the computer whilst holding down the shift key.

A window will appear with UEFI boot settings. Choose to boot from an external device and choose boot from EFI device.

You should now boot into a live session of Ubuntu.

Install Ubuntu

If you want to be able to install updates during the installation click on the network icon in the top right corner and choose your wireless network. Enter the security key when requested. 

If you are happy to wait until after the installation before installing updates do not worry about connecting to the internet. 

If you have a poor internet connection I recommend not installing updates until after the installation has completed.






















Double click on the install icon on the desktop. The above welcome message should appear. 

Choose your installation language and click "Continue".




















If you haven't connected to the internet then the download updates option will be greyed out but if you have connected you can choose to download updates.

Also on this screen you can choose to install third party codecs which make it possible to play MP3 audio.

Note the option that says that you need to turn off secure boot to install the codecs. It is actually easier to not install codecs now and do it post installation whereby you won't have to do anything with secure boot.

Click "Continue".






Rather strangely I was asked whether I wanted to unmount the SSD before installing. I clicked "No" to this option.



















Normally at this stage I would say to choose the "Install Ubuntu alongside Windows Boot Manager" option but because I want to show how to partition the drive manually I suggest using the "Something Else" option. This allows you to specify where each partition is located.





















The next screen shows the layout of your disks. In my case there are partitions on /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.

What you are looking for is the free/unallocated space on /dev/sda which is the SSD and free/unallocated space on /dev/sdb which is the hard drive.

I chose to go for a full install of Ubuntu on the SSD as I will be using this regularly. I also decided to create a swap partition although with 16 gigabytes of RAM this is probably wasted disk space. I therefore put the swap partition on the hard drive.

To create a partition click on the free space on /dev/sda and press the plus symbol.



For the size I chose the whole of the space on the SSD. It is a primary partition and I want to use the beginning of the space (although it doesn't really matter because I am choosing all the space).

I chose EXT4 as the file system and / as the mount point. Clicking OK creates the partition and returns you to the disk layout screen.

With the SSD now completely allocated I moved on to the hard drive.

To create a swap partition I clicked on the free space on /dev/sdb and press the button with the plus symbol again.


I went for the full 16 gigabytes to match the amount of RAM in my machine. This is severely overkill but as I wasn't limited for disk space I went for it anyway.

Again I set the partition to primary but note that I chose to use the end of the space. In theory as this should be hardly used moving it to the end of the disk seems a sensible idea.

The only other thing to note is that I set the use as drop down list to "swap area". Clicking OK takes me back to the disk layout screen.

The rest of the hard drive is still an empty block of free space so what should I do with it?


I chose to create a 50 gigabyte FAT32 partition which gives me a nice area to share files between Linux and Windows without worrying about one not being overly happy with NTFS and the other not being at all happy with EXT4.



The rest I partitioned as a large block of space as an EXT4 partition. This is where I will store all of my larger files that I won't use regularly. Things like movies would fit well into this space.

Note that for these partitions I didn't choose a mount point. I did that later on in the Ubuntu disks tool as it is more user friendly.

With both of the disks now fully allocated I clicked the "Install Now" button. A message appears showing the partitions that will be created. Just continue past this screen.

The rest of the installation is fairly ordinary.

Select where you live by clicking on the map. This will set the time correctly on your computer.


Choose your keyboard layout by selecting the language in the left pane and the layout in the right pane.

Finally create a user. Enter your name and a name for your computer.

Then enter a user name and choose a password and repeat it. 

By default the setup requires you to log in every time you boot but you can get your computer to log in automatically by selecting the option but I don't recommend this.

Click "Continue".

The files will now be copied across and the system will be installed.


Finally you will be asked whether you want to continue testing or restart now. 

You can try rebooting and if the computer boots straight to Windows reinsert the USB drive and hold down the shift key and reboot back to the UEFI boot screen as you did before to get into the live version of Ubuntu.

Then follow this guide which shows how to use EFI Boot Manager to change the boot order.

Summary

When you have finished it is worth following this guide which shows 33 things to do after installing Ubuntu.

Also check out my new guide which shows how to show common applications such as Chrome, Dropbox and Steam easily in Ubuntu.

I am not saying my way is the only way to format the SSD and I welcome comments and suggestions in regards to this area.

The current layout is working well for me however.

Troubleshooting

If Ubuntu still will not boot after running EFI Boot Manager try reading this guide which aims to help with UEFI boot issues.

Posted at 19:28 |  by Gary Newell

Tuesday, 12 April 2016

Introduction

If you have installed Ubuntu alongside Windows 10 and you want to remove it so that Windows 10 is left on its own again follow these steps.

These steps only work for computers where Windows 10 and Ubuntu have been installed on a computer with a UEFI bootloader.

A separate guide will be created for computers with a standard bios.

The steps required for getting Windows back to normal are as follows:

  • Change the boot order
  • Delete Ubuntu From The UEFI boot menu
  • Remove Ubuntu Folder From EFI partition
  • Delete the Ubuntu partition
  • Expand Windows 10 into free space

Change The Boot Order 































Boot into Ubuntu and open a terminal window (either press CTRL, ALT and T at the same time or press the super key and type term until an icon appears and click on it).

Within the terminal window type the following:

sudo efibootmgr

This will show you the current boot order and in theory Ubuntu will be first and Windows second.

My boot order has a few extra ones because I have been a little bit untidy and not deleted old entries. As you can see though it starts at 0004 which is ubuntu and then goes to 0001 which is Windows, 0000 which in theory is Fedora, 0008 which is CentOS, 0005 which is another ubuntu, 0006 which is yet another ubuntu, finally finishing with 2001 which is a USB drive.

Now I don't really have loads of Ubuntus, Fedora and CentOS installed. These are old entries. The important bits are 0004 which really is Ubuntu and 0001 which is Windows.

What you need to do is make Windows the first item in the list again.

Run the following command picking the number which matches Windows Boot Loader:

sudo efibootmgr -0 1

As you can see in my list 0001 is Windows. You can add extra entries if you so wish but this should suffice to make Windows first.

On its own this doesn't delete Ubuntu but it stops it from booting.

Delete Ubuntu From The UEFI Menu

In the previous section you will have noticed from the screenshots that I had a lot of old menu items hanging around.


To delete a menu option you specify the following command:

sudo efibootmgr -b 8 -B
You need to replace the 8 with the number of the menu item you wish to remove. If you look at the image above boot0008 is for CentOS Linux. After running the above command the CentOS has been removed.

The -b switch stands for modify boot number and the -B stands for delete bootnum.

You can specify the same command in the following way:

sudo efibootmgr --bootnum 8 --delete-bootnum

Remove Ubuntu From The EFI Partition 

If you don't remove Ubuntu from the EFI partition then it may be added back to the UEFI boot menu when you add other Linux operating systems.

The steps required here are to work out which partition is the EFI partition, mount it, navigate to it and then delete the Ubuntu folder.

To find out which partition is the EFI partition type the following in a terminal window:

sudo fdisk -l
This lists all the partitions on all the disks attached to your computer.



As you can the EFI partition on my disk is /dev/sda1 as the type shows as EFI system.


I therefore need to mount the EFI partition. I can do this by running the following commands:

mkdir EFI
sudo mount /dev/sda1 EFI
With the EFI partition mounted you can navigate to it using the following command:

cd EFI
When I ran the ls command against the EFI partition there was a folder called EFI. So I navigated to the EFI folder using the cd EFI command again and ran the ls command once more.

As you can see I have folders for the following distributions:
  • Apricity
  • centos
  • debian
  • fedora
  • mageia
  • ubuntu
If I now decided to install another Linux distribution my UEFI menu would undoubtedly be rebuilt with all of those options in it. It is just untidy to leave it this way.

To remove each of the folders all I have to do is use the rm command as follows:

sudo rm -R Apricity

In the image above I have removed all of the Linux folders on the computer leaving just the Boot and Microsoft folders.

Delete The Ubuntu Partition

Boot back into Windows 10 and then right click on the start menu





















Click on the "Disk Management" option in the menu.


As you can see I have highlighted the partition on my computer that currently still has Ubuntu installed on it.

Make sure you choose the correct partition otherwise you may delete something important.


Right click on the partition and choose "Delete Volume".


A message will appear asking whether you are sure you want to delete the selected partition. Click "Yes".

Expand The Windows Partition


You will now have a large area of unallocated disk space. To make that space available again you can extend the windows partition which in most cases is the C: drive.



Right click on the C: drive and choose "Extend Volume".


A wizard will load. Click "Next" to continue.


The maximum amount of available disk space will be automatically selected. Click "Next" to continue.


A summary will appear. Click "Finish".

Summary

Your computer should now be set up as if you had never installed Ubuntu on it in the first place.

How To Remove Ubuntu From A Computer Dual Booting With Windows 10 (UEFI only)

Introduction

If you have installed Ubuntu alongside Windows 10 and you want to remove it so that Windows 10 is left on its own again follow these steps.

These steps only work for computers where Windows 10 and Ubuntu have been installed on a computer with a UEFI bootloader.

A separate guide will be created for computers with a standard bios.

The steps required for getting Windows back to normal are as follows:

  • Change the boot order
  • Delete Ubuntu From The UEFI boot menu
  • Remove Ubuntu Folder From EFI partition
  • Delete the Ubuntu partition
  • Expand Windows 10 into free space

Change The Boot Order 































Boot into Ubuntu and open a terminal window (either press CTRL, ALT and T at the same time or press the super key and type term until an icon appears and click on it).

Within the terminal window type the following:

sudo efibootmgr

This will show you the current boot order and in theory Ubuntu will be first and Windows second.

My boot order has a few extra ones because I have been a little bit untidy and not deleted old entries. As you can see though it starts at 0004 which is ubuntu and then goes to 0001 which is Windows, 0000 which in theory is Fedora, 0008 which is CentOS, 0005 which is another ubuntu, 0006 which is yet another ubuntu, finally finishing with 2001 which is a USB drive.

Now I don't really have loads of Ubuntus, Fedora and CentOS installed. These are old entries. The important bits are 0004 which really is Ubuntu and 0001 which is Windows.

What you need to do is make Windows the first item in the list again.

Run the following command picking the number which matches Windows Boot Loader:

sudo efibootmgr -0 1

As you can see in my list 0001 is Windows. You can add extra entries if you so wish but this should suffice to make Windows first.

On its own this doesn't delete Ubuntu but it stops it from booting.

Delete Ubuntu From The UEFI Menu

In the previous section you will have noticed from the screenshots that I had a lot of old menu items hanging around.


To delete a menu option you specify the following command:

sudo efibootmgr -b 8 -B
You need to replace the 8 with the number of the menu item you wish to remove. If you look at the image above boot0008 is for CentOS Linux. After running the above command the CentOS has been removed.

The -b switch stands for modify boot number and the -B stands for delete bootnum.

You can specify the same command in the following way:

sudo efibootmgr --bootnum 8 --delete-bootnum

Remove Ubuntu From The EFI Partition 

If you don't remove Ubuntu from the EFI partition then it may be added back to the UEFI boot menu when you add other Linux operating systems.

The steps required here are to work out which partition is the EFI partition, mount it, navigate to it and then delete the Ubuntu folder.

To find out which partition is the EFI partition type the following in a terminal window:

sudo fdisk -l
This lists all the partitions on all the disks attached to your computer.



As you can the EFI partition on my disk is /dev/sda1 as the type shows as EFI system.


I therefore need to mount the EFI partition. I can do this by running the following commands:

mkdir EFI
sudo mount /dev/sda1 EFI
With the EFI partition mounted you can navigate to it using the following command:

cd EFI
When I ran the ls command against the EFI partition there was a folder called EFI. So I navigated to the EFI folder using the cd EFI command again and ran the ls command once more.

As you can see I have folders for the following distributions:
  • Apricity
  • centos
  • debian
  • fedora
  • mageia
  • ubuntu
If I now decided to install another Linux distribution my UEFI menu would undoubtedly be rebuilt with all of those options in it. It is just untidy to leave it this way.

To remove each of the folders all I have to do is use the rm command as follows:

sudo rm -R Apricity

In the image above I have removed all of the Linux folders on the computer leaving just the Boot and Microsoft folders.

Delete The Ubuntu Partition

Boot back into Windows 10 and then right click on the start menu





















Click on the "Disk Management" option in the menu.


As you can see I have highlighted the partition on my computer that currently still has Ubuntu installed on it.

Make sure you choose the correct partition otherwise you may delete something important.


Right click on the partition and choose "Delete Volume".


A message will appear asking whether you are sure you want to delete the selected partition. Click "Yes".

Expand The Windows Partition


You will now have a large area of unallocated disk space. To make that space available again you can extend the windows partition which in most cases is the C: drive.



Right click on the C: drive and choose "Extend Volume".


A wizard will load. Click "Next" to continue.


The maximum amount of available disk space will be automatically selected. Click "Next" to continue.


A summary will appear. Click "Finish".

Summary

Your computer should now be set up as if you had never installed Ubuntu on it in the first place.

Posted at 20:58 |  by Gary Newell


back to top